This is a brief excerpt from Ron Dawson’s DareDreamerMag
Editor’s Note: This is part 1 of a 3-part series I plan to write on FCPX. Part 2 will cover what to watch out for. Part 3 will be a short post on workflow.
One other thing. I wrote this review because a lot of reviews I’ve read were either passionate filmmakers pissed off (therefore biased against writing an objective review), veteran editors who have a financial incentive for you to get FCPX, or objective journalists who, although they liked the program, didn’t really learn how to use it properly. I’m none of those things. I have no financial incentive whatsoever. Just a sincere desire to help the industry. Those of you who know me and this blog know that I like to get down to brass tacks and not let personal feelings get in the way of making a good decision for your BUSINESS. That’s what this series is about. Will FCPX be a good choice for your business or career as a filmmaker. But, there is just enough commentary to satisfy the creative in you as well.
+++++++++++
I first took film and video production courses the summer of 1992. Back then we used LINEAR, tape to tape …
By: Ron Dawson
via planet5D pinterest news http://pins.planet5d.com/could-final-cut-pro-x-be-the-nle-of-the-future/
No comments:
Post a Comment